back to atlas

ks · compliance

government · regulation-techdrafting · 2 frameworks

Compliance.

Public collaborations with regulators and civic bodies. The foundry holds protocols, not personal records — and we'd rather show that to a working group than promise it on a pitch deck.

how it works

From consult to align.

  1. § 01open

    Consult

    Regulators read the protocol specs alongside us. We answer questions; they flag gaps. No NDAs.

  2. § 024–8 weeks

    Draft

    We co-author a posture document — what the protocol does, what it doesn't, where the legal seams are.

  3. § 0330–60 days

    Review

    Submit to the working group. Public comment window. Revisions on the record.

  4. § 04yearly

    Align

    Final attestation published. Audit cycle scheduled. Compliance test suite goes open-source.

what we ship

Public, reproducible, auditable.

  • Public attestations

    Every alignment is published — what's covered, what isn't, who signed. No private side-letters.

  • Audit trails by default

    The Trade artifact carries cryptographic receipts; the Neuron artifact logs ingest provenance. Auditors get tooling, not promises.

  • Open compliance tests

    Every framework alignment ships with a test suite anyone can run. Pass/fail is reproducible.

  • PDS sovereignty

    The foundry never custodies user data. Right-to-be-forgotten is a protocol primitive, not a feature request.

active engagements

On the table.

  • EU AI Act

    drafting

    Co-drafting consent attestations for the Neuron protocol. PDS-bound corpora map cleanly to Article 10 data-governance requirements.

    European Unionartifact · neuron
  • GDPR · UK-GDPR

    aligned

    Posture published. PDS sovereignty is the right-to-be-forgotten primitive; deleting the PDS deletes the data, full stop.

    EU + United Kingdomartifact · identity
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights

    consulting

    Reading the protocol alongside Articles 7, 8, 11. Identity is the privacy seam; Trade is the property seam; Neuron is the expression seam.

    European Unionall artifacts
  • Aapti civic-data charter

    consulting

    PDS as a civic primitive. Working with Aapti on the right-to-data-portability spec for South Asian deployments.

    Indiaartifact · identity
  • Open Data Charter

    audited

    Trade Suite — five sovereign paradigms with Phase-7-A formal verification. Money-Lock invariant proved; audit on record.

    Globalartifact · trade

released

Frameworks on record.

  • GDPR posture v1

    Public posture document explaining how PDS sovereignty satisfies right-to-be-forgotten under Articles 17 and 20.

    GDPR · UK-GDPR
    2026 Q1

  • Trade audit-trail spec

    Specification for cryptographic receipts on every trade settlement. Auditable by anyone with public history.

    Open Data Charter
    2026 Q1

  • Neuron consent revocation API

    Reference implementation for revoking consent on PDS-bound training data. Watch the corpus shrink in the audit log.

    EU AI Act (draft)
    2026 Q2

asked often

Quick answers.

  • Where's user data held?

    Not by KashScript. Every account is a DID resolved against a Personal Data Store the user controls. We define formats; we don't custody data.

  • How does right-to-be-forgotten work?

    Deleting the PDS deletes the data. The DID can be tombstoned. The foundry holds nothing to retain.

  • Are the audit reports public?

    Yes. Every framework alignment is a public document. Drafts include public comment windows.

  • Can a regulator request user data?

    There is no user data with us to request. Subpoenas and orders are routed to the relevant PDS operator — the user, or whoever they trust to host them.